Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Wednesday, July 3, 2024 | Back issues
Courthouse News Service Courthouse News Service

Many Trump voters back Senate Democrats, making the chamber a toss-up in the fall

Ticket-splitting between the parties, once a very common practice, is making a surprising resurgence this year.

(CN) — Five, 10, and even 15% or more of swing-state voters are telling pollsters that they plan to support Donald Trump for president and a Democrat for the U.S. Senate this November, making the battle for control of the country's upper chamber a nail-biter.

Around the country, “we’re seeing a rebound of ticket-splitting,” said David Macdonald, a political science professor at the University of Florida.

Divided loyalties on the ballot were common 50 years ago, but they all but died out in the last few elections. Their sudden comeback is giving Republican congressional hopefuls heartburn.

On paper, winning back the Senate should be a cakewalk for the GOP this year: The party is defending only 11 relatively safe seats while the Democrats have to defend 23 seats, many of them in red or purple states, at a time when their presidential standard-bearer is struggling.

And yet, thanks to ticket-splitters, Democratic Senate candidates are ahead in almost all of their races — sometimes polling dramatically better than President Joe Biden.

“It’s important to remember that not all Trump voters are alike,” Macdonald said. “Some of them vote for Trump enthusiastically while wearing a hat, but others vote reluctantly while holding their nose.”

Back in the 1970s, it wasn’t unusual for 25% or more of voters to split their tickets, according to Andrew Smith, director of the University of New Hampshire Survey Center. In both the 1972 and 1984 elections, Democrats picked up two seats in the Senate even though Republicans won the presidency in a 49-state landslide. As late as 1996, Democratic President Bill Clinton easily won reelection while Republicans added two Senate seats.

In fact, from 1968 to 2000, at least 10 states in every election backed presidential and Senate candidates of different parties. But this phenomenon didn’t happen anywhere in 2016, suggesting a dramatic hardening of partisanship. In 2020 it happened in only one state: Maine, which voted for Biden but gave a fifth Senate term to Susan Collins — one of the country’s most liberal Republicans.

If the current polls are to be believed, though, 2024 could once again see a raft of states opt for strange bedfellows.  

Nowhere is the difference starker than in Montana, where polls show Democratic Senator Jon Tester with a lead of between 2 and 9 points even though Biden is losing the state by 21, according to RealClearPolitics.

In Ohio, Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown is up by 5 points, even though Biden is down by 10.

And the pattern is repeating in other swing states. In Arizona and Nevada, the averages show Democratic Senate candidates Ruben Gallego and Jacky Rosen ahead by 5 points, while Biden trails in both states by 3 or more. In Pennsylvania, Democrat Bob Casey leads his Senate race by 5 points while Biden trails by 3 points. In Wisconsin, Biden and Trump are tied, but incumbent Democratic Senator Tammy Baldwin is leading Republican businessman Eric Hovde by 8 points.

This is a dramatic contrast to 2020, when only 3% of voters split their ticket between presidential and congressional candidates, according to Shiro Kuriwaki, a Yale University professor who wrote his dissertation on ticket-splitting. “That’s the lowest number since surveys began in the 1950s,” he said.

In the past, political scientists have had two theories to explain ticket-splitting, according to Macdonald. One is that voters want divided government in order to balance extreme tendencies. In 1996, for instance, some Republican congressional candidates explicitly made the argument that Clinton would likely be reelected and a Republican Congress was needed to keep him in check.

Under this theory, large numbers of voters want to fire Biden this year, but they are wary of Trump’s potential extremism and want a Democratic Congress as an insurance policy to rein him in.

ADVERTISEMENT

But Kuriwaki found little evidence in his research that ticket-splitters are “super-strategic or wanting balance,” and Macdonald is skeptical as well, especially since no one is explicitly making a “rein in Trump” argument this year.

The other theory is that voters simply become comfortable with congressional incumbents regardless of party. When a sitting president is unpopular, voters may blame him for things they’re unhappy about — inflation, say, or the border — but they’re less likely to hold individual members of Congress responsible.

Tester and Brown are good examples of Democratic incumbents who have managed to separate themselves from Washington, according to Macdonald. Tester is a family farmer who lost several fingers in an equipment accident, and “that plays in Montana,” he said, while Brown “has the pulse of Ohio,” and both are experienced, well-funded candidates facing off against newcomers.

Tester is a populist who supports the Second Amendment and veterans’ issues, noted Christopher Muste, a political scientist at the University of Montana. Tester is “running ads against new people coming into the state and making it more expensive,” he added, and positions himself as a bipartisan centrist.

Candidate quality matters, Smith agreed. In Arizona, controversial Republican Kari Lake “is not seen as the most senatorial of candidates,” he commented, while in Wisconsin, Republican Hovde is being attacked as a carpetbagger from California.

But the problem with the incumbency theory is that, statistically, the advantage of incumbency has been declining steadily in recent years, Kuriwaki said.

“In the 1970s and ’80s, the incumbency advantage was much larger, but lately partisanship has become more important," he said.

Stephen Craig, editor of the book "Ambivalence and the Structure of Political Opinion," noted that “partisanship has been the strongest driver of vote choice” and “is an even stronger predictor of the vote today than it used to be.”

In some races, a divisive primary election — such as between a traditional Republican and a MAGA candidate — can prompt voters to split their tickets, Smith noted.

But another theory is that this year’s spike in ticket-splitting is a symptom of a larger party realignment. The high-water mark of ticket-splitting from 1968 through the early 1980s coincided with a sea-change in which the solidly Democratic South became a Republican stronghold, while Republicans started to be eclipsed in the Northeast, reflecting the parties’ altered attitudes toward civil rights and other issues. It’s possible that the current realignment — with Republicans under Trump becoming an increasingly multi-ethnic working-class party while Democrats corner the educated elite — is producing a slice of the electorate that likes Trump but hasn’t become comfortable with the Republican party as a whole.

“Voters themselves have not settled,” said Muste. He thinks many ticket-splitters are “people who are culturally conservative and economically progressive, or vice-versa,” and who no longer have a clear home — such as moderately conservative Republican women who are concerned about abortion rights.

Historically, there’s been little hard data about what kinds of voters split their tickets. One study in 2010 found that ticket-splitting was more common among white voters, as well as those with a lot of trust in government, but Kuriwaki’s more recent research found that race didn’t have a significant effect. His studies showed that ticket-splitting was most common among low-information voters, true moderates, and people whose views don’t fit neatly within the political spectrum.

Even with the potential for a lot of ticket-splitting this year, the Senate map is daunting for Democrats. Republicans currently hold 49 Senate seats, and are virtually guaranteed to pick up one more in November due to the retirement of conservative Democrat Joe Manchin in ruby-red West Virginia. If Donald Trump wins the presidency, Republicans merely need to hold onto those 50 seats to control the Senate (because the vice-president can break a tie). If Biden wins, Democrats need to hold all their current seats except West Virginia, or try to flip a Republican seat.

Republicans have no obvious weaknesses, but Democrats have taken some hope from a new Florida Atlantic University poll that shows the state’s Republican Senator Rick Scott running only two points ahead of former Democratic U.S. Representative Debbie Mucarsel-Powell, an immigrant from Ecuador — a difference that’s within the poll’s margin of error.

Scott, a businessman and former governor, won his previous Senate bid in a squeaker that was so close that it triggered a mandatory recount, but that was in 2018, which was a Democratic-leaning year. Macdonald, the Florida professor, said the recent poll may be an outlier and he'd be “absolutely stunned” if Scott lost in 2024.

On the other hand, Republicans are behind in the polls in every state currently held by Democrats (except West Virginia), so if Biden wins the election, the GOP might not be able to pick up the 51st seat it would need to control the upper chamber.

Perhaps the Republicans’ best chance to flip a seat is in Michigan, where there is no incumbent, because Democrat Debbie Stabenow is retiring, and the state of the race is confusing because primary elections won’t be held until Aug. 6. On the Democratic side, U.S. Representative Elissa Slotkin appears to be the clear primary favorite, while among Republicans, polls show former U.S. Representative Mike Rogers, who was endorsed by Trump, in the lead but with about half the electorate undecided.

As between Slotkin and Rogers, the polling averages currently show Slotkin with a consistent lead but in the very low single digits.

With ticket-splitters favoring Democratic senators across many red and purple states, however, the Senate may well end up 50-50, with the winner of the presidential race getting the Senate as a bonus.

“If Trump wins, Republicans get the Senate,” Macdonald said. “If Biden wins, then it’s up to Tester.”

Of course, it’s possible that a number of voters will revert to their partisan habits once they get into the voting booth, as sometimes happens, warned Craig. “Don't believe everyone who says they plan to split their ticket,” he said.

Categories / Elections, National, Politics

Subscribe to Closing Arguments

Sign up for new weekly newsletter Closing Arguments to get the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and hot cases and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world.

Loading...