Matt Couch failed to plausibly state any claims of actual malice in his defamation suit against a podcaster, a three-judge panel ruled.
Ryan Knappenberger covers the D.C. Federal Courts for Courthouse News Service. He recently graduated with his Master's from the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism at Arizona State University. He has worked in Washington D.C. covering immigration and indigenous issues for Cronkite News, and in Arizona covering arts and culture.
Follow @Ryan_Knappy
Matt Couch failed to plausibly state any claims of actual malice in his defamation suit against a podcaster, a three-judge panel ruled.
The motion comes just hours after a D.C. Circuit panel rejected Bannon's efforts to remain free pending appeal.
The high court said Arizona violated the Confrontation Clause when a witness presented testimonial evidence that was not his during a drug prosecution.
Matt Couch failed to plausibly state any claims of actual malice in his defamation suit against a podcaster, a three-judge panel ruled.
Matt Couch failed to plausibly state any claims of actual malice in his defamation suit against a podcaster, a three-judge panel ruled.
Matt Couch failed to plausibly state any claims of actual malice in his defamation suit against a podcaster, a three-judge panel ruled.
Matt Couch failed to plausibly state any claims of actual malice in his defamation suit against a podcaster, a three-judge panel ruled.
Matt Couch failed to plausibly state any claims of actual malice in his defamation suit against a podcaster, a three-judge panel ruled.