Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Wednesday, April 23, 2025

View Back issues

Deadly Force

<p>A police officer’s use of deadly force against a civilian was “objectively unreasonable,” because the civilian did not pose an immediate threat of serious physical harm to others, the Eighth Circuit <strong><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/deadlyforce.pdf">ruled</a></strong>. The civilian was shot five times without warning after officers responded to the scene of an altercation he had with his uncle. </p>

ST. LOUIS — A police officer’s use of deadly force against a civilian was “objectively unreasonable,” because the civilian did not pose an immediate threat of serious physical harm to others, the Eighth Circuit ruled . The civilian was shot five times without warning after officers responded to the scene of an altercation he had with his uncle.

Categories / Appeals, Civil Rights, Government

Subscribe to our free newsletters

Our weekly newsletter Closing Arguments offers the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world, while the monthly Under the Lights dishes the legal dirt from Hollywood, sports, Big Tech and the arts.

Loading...