Florist Flap

Answering a question from the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday, the Washington state Supreme Court <a href="http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/916152.pdf"><strong>said</strong></a> courts did not act with religious animus in determining a florist violated anti-discrimination laws by refusing to do the flowers for a gay couple’s wedding.

OLYMPIA, Wash. – Answering a question from the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday, the Washington state Supreme Court said courts did not act with religious animus in determining a florist violated anti-discrimination laws by refusing to do the flowers for a gay couple’s wedding.

Categories / Civil Rights, Courts, Religion

Subscribe to our free newsletters

Our weekly newsletter Closing Arguments offers the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world, while the monthly Under the Lights dishes the legal dirt from Hollywood, sports, Big Tech and the arts.