Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Wednesday, April 23, 2025

View Back issues

'Habitual Drunkard'

The en banc Ninth Circuit <strong><a href="http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/05/30/12-73289.pdf">ruled</a></strong> Tuesday that – medical disability or not – chronic alcoholism is a constitutionally valid reason to classify an undocumented immigrant as a “habitual drunkard” lacking the good moral character necessary to avoid deportation.

SAN FRANCISCO – The en banc Ninth Circuit ruled Tuesday that – medical disability or not – chronic alcoholism is a constitutionally valid reason to classify an undocumented immigrant as a “habitual drunkard” lacking the good moral character necessary to avoid deportation.

The immigrant, Salomon Ledezma-Cosino aka Cocino Soloman Ledesma, is a construction worker who entered the United States from Mexico in 1997. After 10 years of alcohol abuse that included drinking an average of one liter of tequila a day, Ledezma-Cosino has acute alcoholic hepatitis and decompensated cirrhosis of the liver.

Tuesday’s en banc ruling reverses a 2-1 Ninth Circuit panel finding that “habitual drunkard” is not unconstitutionally vague.

Categories / Appeals

Subscribe to our free newsletters

Our weekly newsletter Closing Arguments offers the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world, while the monthly Under the Lights dishes the legal dirt from Hollywood, sports, Big Tech and the arts.

Loading...