Updates to our Terms of Use

We are updating our Terms of Use. Please carefully review the updated Terms before proceeding to our website.

Wednesday, April 23, 2025

View Back issues

Malice and kill zones

SAN FRANCISCO — The California Supreme Court clarified two aspects of homicide law: First, to prove the malice element of murder, the state must show an absence of imperfect self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt. Second, in prosecuting attempted murder, there is a difference between having a conscious disregard for life and intending to create a “kill zone” that would kill a single target in addition to collateral victims.

Read the malice ruling [here.](https://webservices.courthousenews.com/sites/Data/AppellateOpinionUploads/2023-17-8--13-43-42-Schuler S272237.PDF)

Read the “kill zone” ruling [here.](https://webservices.courthousenews.com/sites/Data/AppellateOpinionUploads/2023-17-8--13-43-43-Mumin S271049.PDF)

Categories / Appeals, Briefs, Criminal, Law

Subscribe to our free newsletters

Our weekly newsletter Closing Arguments offers the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world, while the monthly Under the Lights dishes the legal dirt from Hollywood, sports, Big Tech and the arts.

Loading...