SACRAMENTO, Calif. — More than a year passed since the world’s largest berry company was given 30 days to file an amended version of its patent infringement complaint against a strawberry startup and its chief, accused by Driscoll’s of using its patented strawberry varieties. Now that the amendment has been filed, the California federal court presiding over the claims has denied the motion, noting that the information cited appears to have been available to Driscoll’s for years.
Read the ruling here.
Read our prior coverage here.
Our weekly newsletter Closing Arguments offers the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world, while the monthly Under the Lights dishes the legal dirt from Hollywood, sports, Big Tech and the arts.
Search Articles
